Delhi HC Upholds Govt Decision to Shift Sonam Wangchuk: 'Within Its Right'

Sonam Wangchuk, the climate activist who has been on an indefinite hunger strike demanding the protection of Ladakh's special status, was shifted from one medical facility to another by the Delhi government. The Delhi High Court has now upheld the government's decision, ruling that it acted within its jurisdiction and in the best interests of the activist's health.

Wangchuk, who was on hunger strike for over 40 days, was initially admitted to the All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) but was later moved to a private hospital. The activist's supporters challenged the move, alleging it was an attempt to isolate him. However, the High Court, in its order on Thursday, dismissed the petition, stating that the government had the authority to decide on the location of medical treatment for a patient who requires urgent care.

The court observed that the decision to transfer Wangchuk was based on medical advice and was not arbitrary. It also noted that the government had a duty to ensure the activist's health and safety. The ruling emphasized that the government's actions were in line with constitutional provisions that allow for reasonable restrictions in the interest of public order and the individual's well-being.

Wangchuk's hunger strike has drawn attention to the demands of the people of Ladakh for constitutional safeguards under the Sixth Schedule and Article 371. The region was stripped of its special status in 2019, and the strike has been a part of a sustained protest. While the court's decision has been met with mixed reactions, it underscores the legal boundaries within which the government can operate in such scenarios.

The High Court's ruling is likely to be seen as a precedent for handling similar situations where the health of an individual involved in a protest is at stake. Legal experts have noted that the court has balanced the rights of the individual with the responsibilities of the state.