SHRC directs Ernakulam admin to secure abandoned quarries with fencing, warning boards
The State Human Rights Commission (SHRC) has ordered the Ernakulam district administration to carry out site inspections of abandoned quarries that pose a public safety risk and take urgent measures to install protective fencing, gates, and warning boards. The directive was issued by SHRC Chairperson Alexander Thomas in a suo motu case registered on the basis of a report in The Hindu highlighting the dangers posed by around 70 abandoned quarries in the district.
In its order, the Commission directed the concerned officials to identify the owners of these quarries and legally instruct them to construct protective fencing. If the owners or permit holders fail to comply, the District Collector, in her capacity as managing trustee of the District Mineral Foundation (DMF), should arrange for the fencing to be installed. The order also specifies that the District Geologist, the Executive Engineer of the Public Works Department, the secretary of the Thripunithura municipality, and the secretaries of the Mudakkuzha, Thiruvaniyoor, Mookkannoor, Malayattoor-Neeleeswaram, Parakkadavu, and Varappetty grama panchayats must conduct joint inspections in coordination with the Joint Director of the Local Self-Government Department and the assistant engineer.
The Commission’s action follows an earlier suo motu case registered after the tragic drowning of a Delhi-based model in the Pettamala quarry in Mudakkuzha near Perumbavoor. In a report submitted to the Commission, the District Collector had noted that the quarry safety fund could be utilised for installing fencing, gates, and warning boards at abandoned quarries. The Collector had also directed the District Geologist to prepare a list of quarries in dangerous condition.
The Director of Mining and Geology informed the Commission that there was no legal impediment to using District Mineral Foundation funds for this purpose. This clarification removes a key hurdle, allowing the administration to proceed with safety measures even if quarry owners are uncooperative or cannot be traced.
The Commission has directed the District Collector, District Geologist, and the secretaries of the concerned local bodies to submit reports on the actions taken within six weeks. Additionally, the Ernakulam Revenue Divisional Officer, assistant geologist, panchayat secretaries, and the secretary of the Thripunithura municipality have been asked to appear in person before the Commission at its sitting at the PWD Rest House in Pathadippalam at 10 a.m. on November 12.
Abandoned quarries across Kerala have long been a source of concern, often filling with rainwater and becoming deathtraps, especially for children and unsuspecting passers-by. Environmental activists and local residents have repeatedly urged authorities to secure these sites. The SHRC’s intervention is seen as a step towards ensuring accountability and preventing further tragedies. The use of DMF funds, which are meant for mining-affected areas, is likely to expedite the process of making these quarries safe.
Officials have welcomed the order, stating that it provides a clear legal framework for action. However, they also acknowledged challenges, including the difficulty in identifying quarry owners, many of whom have abandoned operations years ago. The site inspections will help assess the exact number of hazardous quarries and prioritise those requiring immediate attention.
Residents of areas near abandoned quarries have expressed hope that the Commission’s directive will lead to tangible results. The six-week deadline for submitting action-taken reports is expected to keep the administration on its toes. The upcoming hearing on November 12 will allow the Commission to review progress and issue further directions if necessary.
This development underscores the importance of proactive judicial and human rights oversight in addressing public safety concerns. By invoking suo motu powers, the SHRC has demonstrated its commitment to protecting fundamental rights, including the right to life and safety, even in the absence of formal complaints. The outcome of this case may set a precedent for other districts in Kerala facing similar issues.
