NEET Row: Government Calls for Discussion, Opposition Insists on Minister's Resignation

The ongoing impasse over the NEET examination continued in the Rajya Sabha on Tuesday, with the government urging all parties to engage in a constructive discussion while the opposition stuck to its demand for the resignation of Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan.

During the third day of the Monsoon Session, the Upper House witnessed a fresh face-off as opposition members repeatedly raised slogans and demanded a statement from the government on alleged irregularities in the conduct of the NEET UG 2024 exam. The opposition, led by the Congress and other parties, has accused the National Testing Agency (NTA) of malpractices and has called for a Supreme Court-monitored re-examination.

In response, Parliamentary Affairs Minister Pralhad Joshi reiterated the government's stance, stating that the doors for discussion are always open. He appealed to the opposition to allow the House to function and take up the scheduled business. However, opposition leaders countered that mere discussion is insufficient without concrete action, including the removal of the Education Minister who oversees the NTA.

The stalemate has paralysed parliamentary proceedings for three consecutive days, with both houses being adjourned repeatedly. The government has proposed a debate under Rule 267, which allows for the suspension of regular business to discuss a matter of urgent public importance. But the opposition insists on a statement from the Prime Minister or the Education Minister before any debate.

The NEET controversy erupted after reports surfaced of question paper leaks, grace marks awarded arbitrarily, and a record number of students scoring perfect marks, raising suspicions of systemic flaws. The NTA has denied any wrongdoing and defended the results, but several student protests and legal challenges have ensued.

As the deadlock continues, experts warn that further delays could affect the medical admission schedule. The government, on its part, has urged the opposition to allow the House to function, promising a thorough examination of the issues raised. Whether a middle ground will emerge remains to be seen.